What if Patriots Handled the Pandemic?

pexels-photo-4386340.jpeg

If patriots had been in control of how the pandemic was handled, would our nation be facing the social, economic, and political strife seen today? Has our Government mishandled the American people and the Pandemic?

In this what-if article, we’ll be looking at what it would be like if public servants adhered to their oath to represent the will of the greatest minority of all, the individual. Deep State Media Watch presents to you the alternative handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

First quarter of 2020… The United States and her citizens have been alerted to a seriously infectious virus via a mainstream news broadcast by Dr. Anthony Fauci. The doctor informs the American people that the nations trusted primary care physicians, their practices, urgent care facilities and hospitals will be provided with guidance by the CDC, as well as educational materials for patients. OSHA will be issuing general guidance to employers. The US Postal Service will also be relaying written literature to every deliverable address in the United States.

Those who do not have primary care physicians will be given a website or hotline to call or visit, and a list of primary care physician will be found. Any care offered outside of COVID-19 will not be covered. Doctors and their nurses are encouraged to share their views on COVID-19 vaccines as they are developed and deployed for emergency use authorization, up to and after they are fully approved by the FDA. Doctors are strongly encouraged to advise their patients to get a second opinion from another doctor. Doctors and nurses may appear in the mainstream news to provide their medical advice, but only when another doctor or nurse with an opposing medical opinion is also making an appearance.

Mailers by the post office inform citizens and residents of the USA that all COVID-19 related visits to medical facilities will be covered. In addition to this, a one-time stimulus of $3000 is available to everyone who meets with their doctor to discuss health and hygiene practices during the pandemic. Likewise a stimulus will be given to those who choose to receive the vaccine during the emergency use authorization phase.

In an effort to maintain normalcy and prevent Mass Formation Psychosis, televised and radio broadcast mainstream media has been given guidance to limit coverage and discussion of the pandemic. The advice provided is to deliver weekly updates and reports. This guidance defines abusive reporting practices that have been banned by Executive Order. As a matter of national security during this pandemic, reporters and journalists may provide commentary expressing their views, but in order to not shape public view and or perception, opposing viewpoints or commentary must also be provided equal airtime. Abusive reporting is reporting that intentionally or by reasonably preventable accidental negligence creates cascading fear, paranoia, creates isolated criminal reactions by members of the public whose outrage is incited by media coverage, shapes or influences public views either direction in regards to COVID-19 and the vaccines, and or coverage that exacerbates the crisis for monetary gain. Exploitation of the people and their fear by the media that results in vandalism, violence, or criminal misconduct shall result in fines and the suspension of the licence to broadcast.

Social media platforms will be directed to give their users an opt-out of any COVID-19 related content. Limited protected class status being provided to vaccinated or unvaccinated citizens shall provide those who wish to discuss their views on the COVID-19 the means to openly and freely discuss without fear of persecution and or discrimination. Any actions to censor or ban people from discussing their views and beliefs on the subject shall have the right to seek damages and legal recourse for any discriminatory practiced against them for discussing their views or beliefs.

As vaccines become available, those who do not get them will not be penalized, while those who do may be rewarded as a thank you for their service towards a vaccine that will hopefully be fully approved by the FDA on a timeline no different than past FDA approvals.

By executive order, vaccine manufacturers during a pandemic are no longer shielded from liability, and neither shall businesses who require their employees to be vaccinated.To ensure that these protections cannot be disputed, we will not be referring to treatments and or preventative drugs for COVID-19 as a vaccine, but instead as MRNA treatment. Until fully approved by the FDA for adults, children will not be given the MRNA treatment and studies will exclude testing on children. The treaments will be available exclusively by licensed medical facilities, and on-site licensed care providers. Tents and or pop-up sites to distribute COVID-19 treatments are prohibited.

Healthcare providers will be empowered via tax breaks to extend discounts to customers who are treated, but are prohibited from penalizing customers who are not. In addittion, healthcare providers may include information in their mailers, but shall not call, email, text or advertise for or against COVID-19 treatments.

Non-profits and labor unions may not endorse and or advertise their views or beliefs on COVID-19 treatments, but may provide literature that provides an equal amount of pros and cons so long as sources for data are cited, and those receiving the materials and or adverts are encouraged to do their own independent research.

Businesses will be given guidance, but no government mandates of any kind shall be allowed, as the public has elected public servants to represent their will as individuals. Private sector businesses will have the option to implement social distancing and hygiene requirements to protect themselves and limit their liability. This may include dress code policies that require masks, or social distancing on company owned property; and such policies will not be allowed on publicly owned property. Citizens who decide to receive the treatment or not during the pandemic have been given limited protected class status, and shall not be discriminated against for their views and or beliefs about COVID-19. Encouraging the treatment with incentives is acceptable, but penalizing employees who decline shall not find themselves or their livelihood unlawfully coerced in to taking the treatment.

Retailers will be encouraged and receive tax breaks for providing discounts and rewards to customers who practice social distancing, a negative test result, or treatment card. Retailers and their employees will be prohibited from asking customers about their treatment status, beliefs or views of COVID-19. Customers may be educated via signage and other marketing materials that rewards and discounts are available to customers who have volunteered for the treatment.

All in all, the United States must stand up for individual freedom, always representing the will of individuals, respect the sovereignty of States, and not allow for the Federal Government to rule over states and their citizens. Coercing adults in a manner that eliminates their choice takes an approach that the Government knows best, and puts the Government at odds with citizens. Incentives, not mandates. Not at a federal level. States may act according to their own Constitution, and it is expected that the Supreme Court of the United States will adhere to ensuring States obey their own laws.

Should this have been the way things played out? You decide!

DEEP STATE MEDIA WATCH
January 7th, 2022

Please comment on our Facebook & Twitter posts…

Discover more from The DSMW Network

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading