There is no such thing as bad press when it comes to a business getting attention by the mainstream press. With this free advertising comes a new wave of customers that seeks them out, and gradually many of the customers who once boycotted the business end up becoming consumers again. Is it really any different that individuals might need to bad press for the purpose of getting people to notice them? What would this look like?
Depending on who you talk to, some Trump’s Supporters have lost their faith in a positive–Supreme Court–outcome for President Trump’s allegations of Election Fraud. We at Deep State Media Watch want you to know THERE IS HOPE!
FACT: The mainstream media has reported half of the truth regarding the Election Fraud case; while truthfully reporting that the SCOTUS has Denied the hearings filed by or against the States of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Michigan.
FACT: The mainstream media did NOT report on the fact that the SCOTUS “Granted” amici curiae pertaining to the evidence. An amicus curiae is someone who is not a party to a case who assists a court by offering information, expertise, or insight that has a bearing on the issues in the case. The Mainstream media failed to report that the SCOTUS “Granted” amici curiae”.
But what does this mean?
FACT: Past precedence to rehear “Denied” cases has been set. The SCOTUS Court can rehear cases on the merits—cases, like Kennedy, that the Court may have already been briefed on, heard oral arguments for, and rendered decisions on—if the party seeking rehearing petitions the Court within twenty-five days of the Court’s decision. original decision, must vote to rehear.
How do lawyers being ignored by the press, get attention by the press, so the press cannot ignore the very issues those lawyers are seeking press attention for?
Is it not true that we the–ALL–PEOPLE needed to hear about the evidence? If the media was not relaying the message, then how could these lawyers who have the evidence attract the medias attention? The only way we can think of is to apply what we know about business who get bad press, to that of people seeking ANY kind of press, so that more PEOPLE would know about the evidence.
The mainstream media was projecting the narrative that there is NO (heard) EVIDENCE! Would this not make lawyers who have evidence just a little bit insane? Therefore is it unreasonable that these lawyers did whatever they had to do to get the attention of the mainstream media to the temporary detriment of their own reputations? Is it Temporary? Well as a Trump Supporter who has lost faith in this whole process told us, only time will tell.
IF the only means by which these lawyers had to say “Look at me” was to act in a manner that gets ANY media attention so the mainstream media would give exposure to the largest possible audience to review the evidence, then these lawyers might be so insane that they were also geniuses. Is this not the type of behavior that Trump Supporters would expect of President Trump himself?
Were these lawyers appearing insane, or are they actually insane? The court has agreed to hear the evidence from non-legal experts at the request of these “crazy” lawyers. If not for this fact alone, there is hope! Here is to hoping these lawyers are crazy geniuses!
Related Page: Federal Election News
Related Article: Are Investors Speculating Positive SCOTUS outcome for Trump?
