Introduction:
We introduce the following compelling conspiracy based on patterns of behavior, actions and inaction by those who should share mutual concerns, but instead do not. Is what we are about to lay out indeed our reality? This is a more in depth perspective another post we made titled Deep State in the United States.
Journalists working for major newspapers, and reporters working for major broadcasting would have you believe they are the “free” press, but THAT is a lie!
Journalists on the payroll and freelancers alike work for mainstream media conglomerates and are bound to abide by ethics policies laid out in an employee handbook, which we will cover at the end of this article.
Mainstream media outlets receive money not just through your subscriptions for their services, but also from the marketing they offer via companies who pay for advertising spots.
You might think that because you disagree with the content provided by a program on network, that you can just boycott their programming, and that this will send a message to the mainstream media and their conglomerate, that their offending content and or journalist(s) need to be pulled off the air, and or out of their publications. Unless you have formed a social media campaign, it doesn’t work that way. You and an army of other consumers participating in a boycott, have a nominal effect, especially when you aren’t boycotting the other programs, networks, and publications owned by the entity. Also, if you are paying for a tiered package from cable or satellite provider, a portion of your subscription to your provider goes to all the networks in that tier.
As you can see, attempting to deprive mainstream media conglomerates of your revenue–because they promote content that appalls you–is a relatively fruitless endeavor.
Fascism:
A fascist left wing social media campaign called Media Matters came up with a creative solution, and made it their specialized field to attack and suppress right-wing news, not just by calling for the audience to boycott, but by going after the advertisers. Who funds Media Matters? Are we wrong for calling them fascist? Here’s the definition and example of fascism:
A political movement that employs the principles and methods of fascism, especially the one established by Hitler, the leader of the National Socialist German Workers’ (NAZI) Party, in Europe 1933-1945. From the first hours of Hitler’s invasion of the Soviet Union, the propagandists on both sides of the conflict portrayed the struggle as being a battle of good vs. evil. The Nazis wanted Germans to support the Nazi dictatorship and believe in Nazi ideas. To accomplish this goal, they tried to control forms of communication through censorship and propaganda. This included control of newspapers, magazines, books, art, theater, music, movies, and radio.
Definition and example of fascism derived from the following sources:
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of Fascism (We used Hitler as example)
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of Manichaean language (refers to dualism)
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of Dualism (good vs. evil)
- United States Holocaust Museum (accomplishment of media censorship)
Do you see what we had to do in order to provide you with a complete definition of fascism. The dictionaries themselves do not provide a complete example of what fascism is, and what fascist behavior involves. If you want a true example of propaganda at play, all you have to do is ask a Google Assistant or Siri what fascism is. Both give their definition from Wikipedia. When you look it up on Google, they provide the Wikipedia answer on the right. The definition provided clearly establishes dualism and associates fascism with the far-right:
George Soros donated one million dollars to Media Matter in 2010. But does George Soros say one thing and then do another with his money? We first showed these clip in our article Conspiracies and Prophecies a Matter of Good vs. Evil, but they also has a home here in this non-conspiratorial article:
The Way Things Are Supposed To Be:
One of our most fundamental principles of law in this nation is that everyone is presumed to be innocent unless found guilty in a court of law. Plaintiffs making an allegation must be cross examined in a court so that the named defendant being accused can explore and insure that the claim made against them is solely based on evidence and not on other nefarious self serving motives. If there is no admission, and or the matter does not make it into a court, then people in this country have an obligation to assume innocence until a court establishes otherwise via a verdict. It does not matter if there is an abundance of evidence before the public eye, everyone is entitled to a presumption of innocence.
Who in society gets to decide what the truth is? People with money like his putting it into organizations like Media Matters? An organization so corrupt that they engaged in getting a well known conservative anchorman kicked off a network.
The Way Things Are:
Media Matters used George Soro’s money and sent a virtual mob of angry left-wing activists out with pitchforks to demand that advertisers such as Mercedes, GlaxoSmithKline and others cancel their advertising slots on the Fox News channel. Media Matters strong-armed the network in to canceling and firing Bill O’Reilly on the presumption of guilt.
Mob Rule:
When a country lacks the type of government that George Soros champions, he uses his money to influence social media, to influence the mainstream media, and to influence politicians. The end result of those who are bought out by his influence is pure democracy. What is a pure democracy? Well Merriam-Websters dictionary says it best here:
“democracy in which the power is exercised directly by the people rather than through representatives.“
Sounds great right? It would be great if we weren’t being manipulated with propaganda, suppression, and cancellation. Otherwise, we’d actually have a true representative democracy in the United States, and there would be no chance of pure democracy being used to infringe upon our individual rights and liberties. Our representative democracy would be able to do as it is designed and limit the scope or power that our representatives have over us via legislation. But have our public servants found a way to deliver pure democracy to us outside of the United States Constitution? The answer is yes they are!
Pure democracy outside of our government is allowing non-legislative majorities such as individuals and their causes along with corporations to infringe upon the speech of the minority by way of grassroots activists, movements and causes that politicians, big tech, and mainstream support by influencing popular opinion. Causes that politicians get behind, so remember we said this, because we’ll bring it back in to play.
Fascism & Propaganda in Action:
Which brings us back to the topic of fascism which employs propaganda to achieve a political result. But are there no limits to what can and will be weaponized to achieve the political agenda? The answer to that is not only no, but there are two types of propaganda, which we’ll cover later.
The fascism and propaganda is a continuing threat to the general welfare of this country when those behind it exploit and groom children in the public education sphere, all while the mainstream media fails to cover the scandal. Why are they not covering it? Before we get in to that, let’s cover how…
The Green New Deal all started because a 24 year old in 2017 created a cause called The Sunrise Movement. VICE explains very well how a 24 year old expanded her college base movement in to the public school system, in their article here they state:
“Prakash launched the Sunrise Movement in 2017 with seven other co-founders… They trained youth organizers, bird-dogged politicians, and mobilized Sunrise’s growing ranks for protests and rallies”
Fast forwarded to 9 minutes and 20 seconds into this video:
This 24 year old, Prakash and 7 other adults organized, trained and indoctrinated school age children across the country. They had these children bird dog unsuspecting politicians, which means they had them track down and surprise interview politicians. This on-the-record footage was then turned over to the media in order to get society on board.
Politicians, being what they are, pretended these were just run of the mill motivated children concerned about their future. They didn’t act appropriately on how unusually skilled and trained these kids were… Diane Feinstein and Alexandria Ocazio-Cortez saw an opportunity to makes use of the medias involvement in this form child exploitation to further exploit the children. This is how the Green New Deal came to be:
This movement is not just about the Green New Deal. Those in charge of this movement collude with the other radical leftist movements, and the left-wing mainstream media is not reporting any of this to you, because the mainstream media is in the business of capitalizing on this exploitation. How?
The mainstream media is intentionally injecting prejudice in what you hear and see via opinion editorializing, but also in what they don’t want you to hear and see in what is called Propaganda by omission.
Alexandria Ocazio-Cortez and Diane Feinstein failed their obligations as adults to see the red flag before them. These Congresswoman took advantage of these kids because was and is compatible with their agenda. But what makes it propaganda by omission is that the mainstream media failed to report this.
Remember when we said, “Causes that politicians get behind, so remember we said this, because we’ll bring it back in to play.” Well we’ve come back to that.
Based on the pattern of behavior we’ve laid out, we can see that politicians are attaching themselves to causes no matter who they exploit, and the mainstream media is doing the exact same thing.
The collusion and relationship between the mainstream media, politicians, causes and big tech with their censorship is so dynamic and huge, that unless it is mapped out for use, we’d never be able to see it.
Cancel Culture
Yes we are now making our way in to the topic of cancel culture. Is cancel culture real? Yeah it is, and it needs to stop! Based on everything we’ve laid out, propaganda whether direct or by omission will not be effective if those who provide countering viewpoints do not have their voices silenced.
YouTube recently suspended Right Side Broadcasting for 2 weeks because their live coverage of President Trump at CPAC 2021 violated YouTube’s election misinformation policy. You can read about that here.
From social media influencers to a social media platform, all the way to the President of the United States, many have found themselves either outright banned or just de-monetized. Those who have experience this have had their constitutional rights violated, and we’ll explain how.
Indirect Obstruction of Constitutional Rights Infringed:
Our constitutional rights are being infringed by those who interpret the United Constitution instead of by taking what it says at face value. So with that, we’ll cover what we get out of our first amendment rights.
Per History.com:
“In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.”
That’s awesome right?! But that word “government” literally means that our rights are protected in a manner that the “government”–our public servants–cannot censor us (at least not directly). We the people are the “government” though right? What if a public servant wanted to silence us? How would they achieve that without violating their oath? We aren’t Deep State Media Watch for nothing! We’ll explain how public servants seeking to to implement their agendas would about indirectly silencing us after we take a closer look at the words written in our United States Constitution.
The United States Constitution begins with:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.“
Is there anything perfect about a Union that provides legal immunity to those who need defence from offenders in the Union who disrupted the domestic tranquility of others by being a curse to equal liberty? Is there anything perfect about a Union that enables domestic forces (threats) to infringe upon the individual liberties of We The People? Do those who take an oath not swear to support and defend We the People? Do we have a Government that grants immunity to those who infringe upon liberties such as freedom of expression? The answer to that is yes we do!
Abraham Lincoln said it best in his Gettysburg address:
“This is a government of the people, for the people, and by the people.“
What were Abraham Lincoln’s greatest achievements? Well according to the University of Virgina’s Miller Center here:
“The most lasting accomplishments attributed to Lincoln are the preservation of the Union, the vindication of democracy, and the death of slavery…”
Hence as our United States Constitution begins, “We the People”.
That means if the “government” is “of“, “for“, and “by” We “the people.” (consisting of us as individuals) THAT “We the People” in reference to the United States Constitution ARE the “government“. We are a nation founded on the principles of individualism. Per the Encyclopedia Britannica example here:
In the United States, individualism became part of the core American ideology by the 19th century, incorporating the influences of New England Puritanism, Jeffersonianism, and the philosophy of natural rights. American individualism was universalist and idealist but acquired a harsher edge as it became infused with elements of social Darwinism (i.e., the survival of the fittest). “Rugged individualism”—extolled by Herbert Hoover during his presidential campaign in 1928—was associated with traditional American values such as personal freedom, capitalism, and limited government. As James Bryce, British ambassador to the United States (1907–13), wrote in The American Commonwealth (1888), “Individualism, the love of enterprise, and the pride in personal freedom have been deemed by Americans not only their choicest, but [their] peculiar and exclusive possession.”
The words “We the People” appearing in the United States Constitution are to apply to us all individually and equally; NOT JUST COLLECTIVELY. As citizens we are to be good Samaritans, we are called by our civic duty to actively insure all of our fellow citizens have equal protections by and for our fellow citizens. More importantly, we expect the those who swore an oath to support, defend, and represent us in a manner that respects and does not forsake our individuality, but that defends, preserves and protects our Constitutional rights and liberties from all threats foreign and domestic. Those who swore an oath are duty-bound to protect defend and preserve our individual rights and liberties not just for our common defence, but also for our general welfare.
What good are those who swore an oath to us if they turn there heads while domestic threats to our individual rights and liberties are under attack by politicians who work the system outside of their scope, to manipulate or control us by proxy? What of their oath? EVERYONE who swears an oath is Constitutionally bound to protect EVERYONE’s general welfare from any threat foreign or domestic in order to secure everyone’s Blessings of Liberty for all future generations.
The idea that our U.S. Military’s job is to just obey the President and protect and defend us collectively per the order of the commander in chief, and or the orders of Congress is just nonsense. The oath that servicce members take is written in the order it is written for a reason. Here is the oath that our military takes:
I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”
Who is first mentioned in the United States Constitution? “We The People”. Obedience to the orders of the President are not the number one priority in the oath taken by service members, an oath to We The People is the number one priority to those who put on a uniform. If our public servants are actively derelict in their duty to serve us, then it does not matter if that dereliction runs all the way up to the Commander-in-Chief himself.
Disenfranchised by Representation That Doesn’t Represent:
75 million people affected by the outcome of our 2020 Presidential Election believe that the election was stolen via fraud. These 75 million people have been pro-military, and pro-law enforcement. The idea that ALL of our institutions failed in their duty to address national security concerns leaves this nation in a state of constitutional crisis as 75 million have lost confidence in this past election and future elections to come. There is nothing more democratic than the voting process.
Collusion in a Nutshell:
For cancel culture to go on as it has, and in a manner that makes it so abundantly clear that the targeted are those with right-wing views; everyone should be concerned that all views aren’t facing equal scrutiny.
It is imperative that everyone becomes a quick student of history, because if we are not all educated on how our present parallels the past, we are doomed for the past to repeat itself. What we are witnessing in our era is a real danger to equal liberties and rights.
These social media platforms are engaging in behavior that shapes societal views in a manner that demonstrates involvement and collusion with big tech and mainstream media; the prejudice is evident with every thing that is canceled, and everyone who is censored.
The entire mainstream media industry makes it clear that they do not view the active silencing of individuals or their platforms as something that poses a future threat to their own line of business. It’s not like fascist regimes didn’t take over and control what the press could report, so why should the mainstream media care?
Alternative sources breaking information to viewers competes with mainstream media. The mainstream medias selective lens (choosing which stories we get to see) and their opinion editorializing establishes a narrative that eliminates our need to think for ourselves. Big tech suppresses and cancels out platforms and individuals who journal their views on social media platforms, and the relationship between all of them are symbiotic.
The benefits of propaganda by omission are not as effective for the mainstream media without big tech’s censorship quashing views they deliberately avoid reporting on, which brings us to the fact that the employee handbooks of these major corporations for the most part do not prohibit sweetheart arrangements that promotes and encourages a prejudice reporting culture. Not only is cancel culture real, but the mainstream media is instrumental in making it effective, and they participate in their own version of it.
How real is cancel culture in the mainstream media’s world? So real that they lie to you about it not existing. The New Statesman & Time claim that cancel culture does not exist. What would be there motive for not wanting you to believe in it? Are they implicated in the culture itself? If that were the case, then making you believe their story is beneficial to them maintaining status quo practices. You know the truth now, because we’ve brought it to you.
- Social media influencers are canceled or de-monetized when news that could be reported suppressed and or just not investigated all while the camera is selectively aimed while the journalists tell you what to think (cancelling out whatever opinion you would have had with fact based reporting).
- Our nation’s youth are being brainwashed to fear the future and rebel against their parents views.
- Politicians make sweetheart deals for big tech and mainstream media in exchange for going easy on legislation and or granting exclusive interviews (which cancels out journalists who do have integrity)
- Cancel culture is VERY MUCH real.
What can we do to cancel the mainstream media, prevent our youth from being brainwashed, and stop politicians from making sweetheart deal to sellout journalists and social media platforms who work together to shape narratives and suppress countering views? You decide!
If you’re wondering to what degree journalists can form sweetheart deals with big tech and politicians, we’ve got their handbooks hyperlinked below, with the important context posted as well. Can journalists and freelancers be borderline handbook compliant to accomplish everything we’ve outlined? You decide!
WarnerMedia
Lets take a look at WarnerMedia. Who do they own?
- CNN
- Headline News
- Castle Rock Entertainment
- TMZ
- HBO
- The CW (50% shared ownership with ViacomCBS)
Who else does WarnerMedia own? For the complete list you can click here.
Then there is the fact that WarnerMedia even allows for their journalists to receive and or give gifts. We’ll give you the scoop on why they allow it, and the rules regarding this allowance. Yes CORPORATE has got their rules, but NOTHING stops these “free press” journalists from working around them.
Here is what Warner Media’s employee handbook says:
“From time to time, you may receive or give gifts that are meant to show friendship, appreciation or thanks from people who do business with WarnerMedia or it’s divisions. You should never accept or offer gifts or entertainment when doing so may improperly influence or appear to influence either party’s business decisions. Cash gifts are prohibited and should not be offered or accepted under any circumstance. In general, more expensive gifts are more likely to cause a conflict of interest. Thus, you need approval from your supervisor and your division’s Compliance Office to accept or give a gift worth more than $500 U.S. (or local equivalent). The $500 limit applies not just to one-time gifts, but all gifts from the same source during any 12-month period…”
“There are special rules that apply to dealing with government officials, including U.S. federal, state, and local officials, as well as officials of other countries. You must consult your Legal department or your division’s Compliance Office before giving gifts, entertainment or “anything else” of value to any government official.“
ViacomCBS
ViacomCBS assets? Click here for that, otherwise they owns several local CBS stations directly and of course CBS News. Their Employee Handbook can be seen if you click here, and it says:
“Viacom employees and directors may not give gifts of any value to any public official, or to the official’s spouse or child. In some cases, after consultation in advance with the Viacom Government Relations Office, certain gifts to federal officials may be permitted.“
The Walt Disney Company
Then there is The Walt Disney Company who owns ABC & ABC News among a concerning volume of other companies (huge monopoly!) The Walt Disney Company at least covers indirectly giving. For their handbook you can click here. Their handbook says:
“The rules for giving gifts to government officials are very strict. Never offer, promise or give (either directly or indirectly) anything of value to induce or influence a government official (including officials of international organizations, political parties and employees of state-owned or state controlled enterprises) to gain an improper advantage or to do something improper. Violations can subject you and our Company to severe penalties and damage our public reputation. Regardless of local practice or the practices of other companies, make sure you avoid even the appearance of doing something improper. Giving any gift requires accurate record keeping. Any gift permitted under our policy and given by you in connection with your job must be transparent and recorded accurately in our corporate books and records. When completing an expense report regarding the gift, you are required to accurately state the purpose of the expense and the person to whom you gave it. You must also identify whether it was given to a government official – in which case you should have obtained the approval of the Legal department in advance.”
NBCUniversal a Comcast Company
Then there is NBCUniversal a Comcast company. For a list of their assets click here. NBCUniversal owns several local NBC stations directly and of course NBC News, CNBC, and MSNBC. Their Employee Handbook can be obtained here, and it says:
“Our interactions with governments and our political activities comply with applicable laws, regulations, and Company policies. Our Company works with government entities and interacts with government officials to protect our business objectives and achieve public policy goals. Our Company policies outline the requirements, limitations and restrictions for engaging in activities such as lobbying for a cause or piece of legislation, hiring a third party to advocate on the Company’s behalf, offering anything of value to a government official, contributing to a political candidate or committee, selling our products and services to a government agency, or otherwise interacting with government officials. We also recognize that employees may participate in their personal capacity in political activities in the communities in which we live and work. When engaging in political activities and interacting with government, we adhere to the highest legal and ethical standards, and comply with Company policy.“
NOTE: These employee handbooks do not put restrictions on freelance journalists.
Do freelance journalists–writing for any of the companies we just covered–have to abide by the same ethics policies that employee do? That answer is YES. If you would like to read about that, you can in Current’s article How ethics guidelines can catch freelancers by surprise.
